What USDA Just Announced

On June 23, 2026, USDA's Natural Resources Conservation Service announced it is accepting RCPP project proposals now through August 24, 2026. The Regional Conservation Partnership Program will invest up to $310 million in partner-driven conservation work, with $30 million set aside specifically for projects led by Indian tribes.

The funding is available through two tracks:

RCPP Classic — Projects implemented using NRCS contracts and easements with producers, landowners, and communities in collaboration with project partners.

RCPP Alternative Funding Arrangement (AFA) — The lead partner works directly with agricultural producers to develop innovative conservation approaches that would not otherwise be available under RCPP Classic.

NRCS will rank proposals based on how well they address soil health, water quality, or wildlife habitat; leverage precision agriculture technologies to target conservation activities; focus on Farmers First principles; and support projects led by Indian tribes.

The Working Families Tax Cuts Act is delivering the largest long-term investment in NRCS conservation programs in decades, with $425 million in fiscal year 2026 and $450 million annually from FY2027 through FY2031. Critically, 75 percent of RCPP funding now goes directly to farmers or covers the cost of conservation practice implementation.

Who Should Be Applying

The Regional Conservation Partnership Program is designed for organizations that can serve as lead partners to bring conservation activities to producers who might not otherwise access NRCS programs on their own. Eligible entities include:

• Nonprofits and farmer cooperatives
• Institutions of higher education and university extension programs
• Conservation districts and state conservationists
• Indian tribes
• Municipal water or wastewater treatment entities
• Agricultural or silvicultural producer associations
• Water districts and other local government entities

If your organization works with farmers, ranchers, or landowners on conservation planning, soil health, nutrient management, cover crops, or land management, RCPP is worth a serious look. The program was built to multiply the reach of NRCS by funding partners who already have producer relationships on the ground.

Why Program Infrastructure Matters as Much as Your Proposal

Here is what we hear from program administrators after a successful proposal: winning the funding was the easy part.

The harder challenge is executing at scale, managing enrollment across dozens or hundreds of producers, collecting verification documentation, staying on top of reporting deadlines, and doing all of it without burning through your staff.

FarmRaise has worked alongside conservation organizations, food companies, government agencies, and financial institutions running producer programs of all shapes and sizes. Despite different goals, they all ran into the same operational reality. Running a program at scale is not primarily a policy challenge. It is an execution challenge.

Programs succeed or fail based on how easily producers can participate and how efficiently staff can manage information.

A few things we see consistently:

Simplicity drives participation more than incentive size. Producers evaluate effort alongside economics. Programs that scaled quickly had clear eligibility rules, predictable approval timelines, and minimal upfront documentation. If a farmer cannot determine eligibility in five minutes, they will not invest more time, regardless of the financial assistance available.

Staff workload determines program capacity. Every application creates a chain reaction: intake review, follow-ups, on-farm verification, contracting, reporting, and participant support. If those tasks rely on manual coordination, your program has a hard capacity ceiling no matter how much RCPP funding you receive.

Reporting requirements should shape data collection from day one. Programs frequently collect information because it might be useful, then discover later that the required reporting format does not match what was collected. Start with your final reporting deliverable and work backward.

Common Implementation Mistakes That Derail RCPP Programs

Based on what we have seen across dozens of programs, these five mistakes come up over and over again:

Launching before workflow testing. Opening enrollment without running internal test applications almost always surfaces unclear instructions, missing data fields, and approval bottlenecks. A small pilot with internal users or trusted participants prevents months of downstream cleanup.

Collecting everything up front. Trying to gather all possible information at application slows adoption and increases abandonment rates. Stage it instead: eligibility intake first, then approval and contracting, then on-farm practice verification data, then reporting documentation.

Underestimating participant support needs. After approval, participants still need reminders, clarification, and reporting guidance. Programs without structured support channels end up handling hundreds of individual emails and calls. Staff spend more time answering repeated questions than administering the program.

Relying on spreadsheets for active management. Spreadsheets struggle as operational systems when you are tracking applications, approvals, payments, and communications simultaneously. The cost is not just inefficiency. It erodes trust in your program data.

Designing for perfect data instead of real behavior. Producers submit approximate information first and refine later. Programs that reject imperfect early submissions see lower participation. Programs that accept preliminary information and guide correction later maintain engagement and improve data quality over time.

Operational Benchmarks to Set Before You Launch

If you are preparing an RCPP proposal or getting ready for enrollment, these benchmarks help you plan realistically:

• Producers in well-structured programs complete initial enrollment in under 10 minutes. If your process takes longer, expect higher drop-off rates.
• Staff review per application should average 5 to 15 minutes once workflows are standardized. Programs where review consistently exceeds 30 minutes struggle to scale beyond a few hundred participants.
• Manual or document-heavy processes often see application completion rates below 40 percent. Guided digital enrollment with structured support typically reaches 80 to 95 percent.
• A single full-time program administrator can reliably manage 50 to 100 participants manually, 500 to 1,500 with structured workflows, and several thousand with automated intake, notifications, and tracking.

Most RCPP program expansion plans fail because organizations estimate participation capacity based on funding rather than operational throughput. If you're not sure where your current workflow falls on this scale, FarmRaise can walk through it with you in 20 minutes.

How FarmRaise Supports RCPP Program Administration

FarmRaise's Program Management Solution was built for exactly the kind of work RCPP demands: multi-partner conservation programs, producer-facing enrollment, on-farm verification, and compliance reporting tied to federal requirements.

Here is how we support organizations administering RCPP Classic and AFA programs:

Digital enrollment and onboarding. FarmRaise creates custom application portals with eligibility filters and e-signatures, eliminating paper forms and cutting the time from application to approval. Eligibility filters ensure only qualified producers advance through the pipeline, directly reducing administrative review time and keeping your staff focused on program delivery, not inbox triage.

Automated on-farm verification. Producers submit real-time, timestamped, geotagged photos directly from their mobile device. Your staff gets documentation when it happens, not weeks later when you're scrambling before a reporting deadline.

Incentive payments at scale. Direct-to-bank or gift card disbursement with real-time payment status dashboards keeps stakeholders informed while maintaining clear audit trails for NRCS and funder reporting.

Reporting on demand. Generate compliance-ready reports for NRCS offices, county committees, and partner funders in minutes, not weeks. Monitor program impact by location, commodity, or demographic, and produce custom outputs on your schedule rather than your deadline.

Dedicated producer support. FarmRaise's integrated producer support team handles technical questions, document uploads, and automated notifications,  so your staff focuses on partner coordination and conservation planning, not answering the same enrollment question fifty times.

Institutional knowledge protection. Staff turnover is one of the most consistent threats to RCPP program continuity. When key information lives in personal email accounts and disconnected spreadsheets, one departure becomes a program continuity crisis. FarmRaise centralizes program data so incoming staff can get up to speed without sacrificing compliance or momentum.

The Window Is Open. August 24 Is the Deadline.

RCPP project proposals are being accepted now through August 24, 2026 on the RCPP portal. For program administrators already running producer-facing work, this is a real opportunity to formalize partnerships, access financial assistance, and scale conservation activities with NRCS backing.

The organizations that win proposals and then deliver on them are the ones that treat program operations as a primary design component, not an afterthought.

If you are preparing an RCPP proposal and want to talk through what it would take to administer the program at scale, FarmRaise offers free consultations. You will leave with a practical outline of what it takes to run the program smoothly, whether or not you use our software.

FarmRaise's Program Management Solution supports nonprofits, cooperatives, universities, tribal governments, and other RCPP lead partners with digital enrollment, on-farm verification, payment disbursement, and compliance reporting. Reach out to taylor@farmraise.us or book a 30 minute meeting to learn more

‍